subscribe: Posts | Comments

Wife’s Affair Grounds for CEO Discharge?

8 comments

The Man Gene turned inside out. It’s usually a male CEO who’s caught in an affair. If the CEO’s spouse is caught in an affair, should the CEO be fired?

Northern Ireland’s top leader, the First Minister, has taken a six weeks leave of absence to deal with his wife’s affair. She’s tried to kill herself and is under acute psychiatric care. Her lover of two years was, at the beginning of the relationship, a teenager. The spouse is an influential lawmaker in her own right. She’s accused of borrowing $80,000 from two property developers (conceivably a shakedown of two political donors) to help her young paramour start a coffeehouse. Now, her CEO husband is accused of knowing about the loans but taking no action — something he denies.

Let’s take off the table the First Minister’s alleged knowledge of the loans. Let’s say he he didn’t know and had nothing to do with it. Could he still be fired? Probably. Should he still be fired? Probably.

One could argue that the First Minister didn’t do anything wrong — that he shouldn’t be held accountable for his spouse’s indiscretions. But he’s responsible for running the country. It’s highly unlikely that a leave of absence will remove the enormous distraction of this sordid situation. One can also argue that he can’t possibly do his job under the circumstances.

A CEO doesn’t have to be fired in this kind of situation. Depending on how all the facts shake out, he may become the sympathetic man scorned. Why should he be punished? It’s not so much a matter of punishment as it is a matter of what’s best for the country. In that vein, he should convert his leave of absence into a resignation. If he can’t bring himself to do it, the best interests of the country should prevail, and he should be sacked.

  1. Tony Kessler says:

    Gosh, John, you’re in a “firing” mood today!

  2. ACU Frank says:

    He must have seen “Up In The Air” during his vacation!

  3. John Phillips says:

    Thanks for your comments, Tony and Frank. I have seen “Up in the Air,” but that has nothing to do with today’s posts. I think I did a post on that movie in December.

    Do ya’ll disagree with my conclusions on the firings?

    John

  4. Tony Kessler says:

    I am in agreement for the most part. I feel a little sorry, though, for the poor First Minister who (if what you say is true and he didn’t know about his wife’s shakedown of political donors) probably not only loses his marriage but also (if you fire him) his job. Double whammy.

  5. John Phillips says:

    He’s indeed a pitiable figure. Him or the country? The CEO or the company?

  6. I think the First Minister has an opportunity to salvage his job IF he walks away from his marriage.

  7. John Phillips says:

    Interesting point, Frank. Also, IF he didn’t know anything about the loans.

  8. Tony Kessler says:

    State-sanctioned divorce — now that’s a new twist!

Leave a Reply