subscribe: Posts | Comments

Fighting in the Workplace

2 comments

With or without a written policy, fighting in the workplace is taboo. Many employers do have written policies about fighting. Some policies call for the automatic termination of anyone engaged in a fight. In other words, there’s zero tolerance for fighting.

A fight recently broke out at the Washington Post between a reporter and an editor. The editor was berating the story of the reporter’s colleague. The reporter, in defense of his friend, called the editor an expletive. The editor threw a punch. Others in the newsroom rushed to break up the altercation.

The editor, a Pulitzer Prize winner, had already taken his employer’s buyout proposal and had only three weeks left at the paper. Apparently, there was more to the fight than just one incident. Some scoffed that a fight in a newsroom would make news, given the history of fights in the newspaper business.

It’s unclear whether the Post has a policy on fighting or whether it will take any action against the editor or reporter. Since the editor is on the way out the door after many years of service and since tempers are probably flaring more than ever in most newsrooms these days, it’s unlikely that the Post will enforce much, if any, discipline.

This is a good example of why zero tolerance policies aren’t good for the workplace, as noted in a post I did a few days ago. I’m not saying that fighting at work shouldn’t be taken seriously. I am saying that each incident can’t be handled the same way.

  1. ACU Frank says:

    On the other hand, this would probably be a great way for the Post to eliminate a buyout payment. I would think the buyout offer had some sort of clause requiring a certain level of performance through the remainder of employment.

  2. John Phillips says:

    ACU Frank,

    Thanks for comment and good point. The clause you’re referring to usually doesn’t address fighting but probably contains a general catchall provision that could very well cover fighting. This incident has also provoked some unwanted publicity for the Post. That said and bearing in mind that I don’t have all the facts, I think I’d rather have the editor’s side of this than the Post’s, although it’s the side of the employer I’m usually on.

    John

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Twitter Trackbacks for Fighting in the Workplace | The Word on Employment Law [employmentlawpost.com] on Topsy.com - [...] Fighting in the Workplace | The Word on Employment Law employmentlawpost.com/theword/2009/11/06/fighting-in-the-workplace – view page – cached With ...
  2. uberVU - social comments - Social comments and analytics for this post... This post was mentioned on Twitter by JohnPhillipsJr: What should an employer (like Washington ...
  3. Fighting in the Workplace | The Word on Employment Law — Tip to Make money - [...] Read more from the original source:  Fighting in the Workplace | The Word on Employment Law [...]

Leave a Reply

Please note that any information you post by submitting a comment here will be public and will not be private or confidential. Please also note that although lawyers participate in this blog and contribute comments, you should not use this blog or any comments to obtain legal advice or with the expectation of establishing an attorney-client relationship. The comments submitted here are not privileged or protected by the attorney-client relationship. The thoughts, opinions, or comments here are those of the individual author and should not be taken as legal advice or recommendations for any particular situation. Because the facts of each employment situation are different, you are encouraged to seek private counsel if you have questions or need advice.