subscribe: Posts | Comments

Tests Used to Screen Out Applicants

0 comments

Slate Magazine has an interesting article about the long-standing question of whether employment tests used in the hiring process to screen out applicants are racially biased. It focuses on a recent study published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics on the subject.

The conclusion? Most of these tests are probably biased to varying degrees, but no more than average human beings making hiring decisions. So, the use of the tests is no more likely result in bias than not using the test. In fact, according to the study, a biased employment test will only aggravate the problem of discrimination if it is more biased than the average decision maker.

It’s still important for employers to be careful in the use of these tests. The tests do create evidence that can be used to show discrimination, but the tests can also improve the quality of the hires you make. Most employers don’t intentionally discriminate on the basis of race. Most employers do want to hire the most qualified applicant, regardless of race. The use of an employment test by a highly qualified human resources professional can assist in the lawful hiring of the best candidate.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Tests Used to Screen Out Applicants | The Word « Employment Law - [...] Re­ad the­ re­s­t he­re­: T­est­s Used­ t­o­­ Screen O­­ut­ A­p­p­... [...]

Leave a Reply