Presidential Politics–Age–Retirement Savings
When I did my post about the possible impact of the election of certain presidential candidates on the workplace, I said an issue that no one was dealing with was the need to modify the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. (That’s an issue on which I had already expressed an opinion.) Well, the candidates are still not dealing with this issue directly, but as an article in the Los Angeles Times emphasizes, there is a new issue: the income squeeze likely to occur on retirees who don’t have enough saved. All the candidates are scrambling to propose plans to deal with this problem.
The first group of citizens who will be impacted by this issue is employees who have retired recently or those who will retire within the next five years–or, more accurately, employees who are expected to retire within the next five years. This brings us back to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Employees who are expected to retire may not be able to. They’re all in the protected age group. If you retire them, there’s great potential for an explosion of age discrimination cases, as one of my first posts predicted.
I’m still hoping that the candidates will be forced to deal more directly with what I see as fundamental problems in the age law. We’ll see.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
- Election » Blog Archive » Presidential Politics–Age–Retirement Savings - [...] The Swamp wrote an interesting post today on Presidential Politicsâ??Ageâ??Retirement SavingsHere’s a quick excerptWhen I did my post about ...








There are so many election blogs out there now that when you write anything about an election issue, it’ll be picked up somewhere. The above election blog links to this post dealing with the “new” retirement savings issue presidential candidates are trying to address now and my hope that this issue could lead them to start talking about the broader issue of age discrimination and the possiblity of amending the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.